|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A- A- A- | |
| Review by Xibo | Date seen: November 19, 2000 |
| Viewing Location: 42nd St AMC Empire 25, NYC | Grade: A- |
| Summary: A decent holiday Schwarzenegger romp. | |
| Arnold Schwarzenegger movies are almost always a lot of fun, and this is no exception. While this film isn't in the same league as some of his classics (like Total Recall, True Lies, Terminator 2, etc), it still is a lot of fun. | |
| B+ B+ B+ | |
| Review by Finrod | Date seen: 0, 0000 |
| Viewing Location: satellite TV | Grade: B+ |
| Summary: Worth viewing on HBO, more scifi than most of Arnie's movies | |
| This movie was better than I thought it would be, probably because I wasn't expecting much. If I had been expecting something along the lines of the Terminators or Total Recall, I probably would have been disappointed. As is, it takes a reasonable approach to future tech, especially cloning, which is at the center of the movie. It raises more questions than it answers, which is probably as it should be anyways. | |
| B B B | |
| Review by Orion | Date seen: December 12, 2000 |
| Viewing Location: Carmike Cinema, Schillinger Road, Mobile | Grade: B |
| Summary: Isn't arnold getting too old for this? | |
| It's a good action movie... nice special effects, hot evil babe, lots of explosions. It has a lot of pretty goofy scientific leaps, though, and tends to have a bit too much message. That said, it's pretty entertaining when you ignore all that. Nice holo-babe, too. | |
| C+ C+ C+ | |
| Review by Z | Date seen: December 14, 2000 |
| Grade: C+ | |
| Summary: mediocre action movie with pretensions towards current ethical issues | |
| Terrible pacing, ridiculous science, not terribly imaginative. | |
"I should put quotes here."